How to Analyze Direct Labor Variances and Their Effects

Prepare aflexible budget for output levels of 4,000 locks and 11,000 locks for the month endedApril 30, 2018. Prepare a standard cost income statement for management through gross profit. Before looking closer at these variances, it is first necessary to recall that overhead is usually applied based on a predetermined rate, such as $X per direct labor hour. This means that the amount debited to work in process is driven by the overhead application approach. Once again, debits reflect unfavorable variances, and vice versa. Such variance amounts are generally reported as decreases (unfavorable) or increases (favorable) in income, with the standard cost going to the Work in Process Inventory account.

One must consider the circumstances under which the variances resulted and the materiality of amounts involved. One should also understand that not all unfavorable variances are bad. For example, buying raw materials of superior quality (at higher than anticipated prices) may be offset by reduction in waste and spoilage. Blue Rail’s very favorable labor rate variance resulted from using inexperienced, less expensive labor. Was this the reason for the unfavorable outcomes in efficiency and volume? The challenge for a good manager is to take the variance information, examine the root causes, and take necessary corrective measures to fine tune business operations.

How to Calculate Direct Labor Variances

As a result, the techniques for factory overhead evaluation vary considerably from company to company. To begin, recall that overhead has both variable and fixed components (unlike direct labor and direct material that are exclusively variable in nature). The variable components may consist of items like indirect material, indirect labor, and factory supplies.

If the actual hours worked are less than the standard hours at the actual production output level, the variance will be a favorable variance. A favorable outcome means you used fewer hours than anticipated to make the actual number of production units. If, however, the actual hours worked are greater than the standard hours at the actual production output level, the variance will be unfavorable. An unfavorable outcome means you used more hours than anticipated to make the actual number of production units.

Formula

It is the difference between the standard cost of labour allowed (as per standard laid down) for the actual output achieved and the actual cost of labour employed. Doctors, for example, have a time allotment for a physical exam and base their fee on the expected time. Insurance companies pay doctors according to a set schedule, so they set the labor standard. They pay a set rate for a physical exam, no matter how long it takes. If the exam takes longer than expected, the doctor is not compensated for that extra time.

The labor variance is particularly suspect when the budget or standard upon which it is based has no resemblance to actual costs being incurred. As with direct materials and direct labor variances, all positive variances are unfavorable, and all negative variances are favorable. The materials price variance is the difference between actual costs for materials purchased and budgeted costs based on the standards.

Rate this article

In this illustration, AH is the actual hours worked, AR is the actual labor rate per hour, SR is the standard labor rate per hour, and SH is the standard hours for the output achieved. Learn how to calculate variances with direct materials and direct labor. Variances are changes to the costs an organization has budgeted, they can be either https://turbo-tax.org/how-can-i-change-the-language-setting-to-spanish/ favorable or unfavorable. The variance analysis is done for direct material, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead and expressed as favorable, unfavorable, and none. The variance is the difference between the flexible budget amount with the actual amount incurred and reasons for variance are identified and steps are taken to address it.

This can go back to the fact that, while your employees find your product or service easy to make or deliver, it’s just a more time-consuming process than everyone expected. Hence, variance arises due to the difference between actual time worked and the total hours that should have been worked. This variance can usually be traced to departmental supervision.

AccountingTools

This would produce an unfavorable labor variance for the doctor. Doctors know the standard and try to schedule accordingly so a variance does not exist. If anything, they try to produce a favorable variance by seeing more patients in a quicker time frame to maximize their compensation potential. If the outcome is unfavorable, the actual costs related to labor were more than the expected (standard) costs. If the outcome is favorable, the actual costs related to labor are less than the expected (standard) costs.

Note that unfavorable variances (negative) offset favorable (positive) variances. A total variance could be zero, resulting from favorable pricing that was wiped out by waste. A good manager would want to take corrective action, but would be unaware of the problem based on an overall budget versus actual comparison. It is that part of labour cost variance which arises due to the difference between standard labour cost of standard time for actual output and standard cost of actual time paid for.

Problems with Labor Variances

Thus it would be fool proof if we are able to remember the relations in the formula as abbreviations representing values rather than the number assigned for values. Despite the fact that the duty of wages/work rate fluctuations can be put on human resource department, this sort of difference is generally considered uncontrollable. This will allow the manager to investigate the causes of the variances. Variances must be calculated to identify the exact cause of the cost overrun.

• If we are to find out the variances for individual materials, then multiple calculations of this sort have to be made once for each labour/labor type.
• Thus, the Total Variable Overhead Variance can be divided into a Variable Overhead Spending Variance and a Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance.
• Blue Rail’s very favorable labor rate variance resulted from using inexperienced, less expensive labor.
• For example, many of the explanations shown in Figure 10.7 “Possible Causes of Direct Labor Variances for Jerry’s Ice Cream” might also apply to the favorable materials quantity variance.
• The labor variance is particularly suspect when the budget or standard upon which it is based has no resemblance to actual costs being incurred.

Comparing this figure ($125,000) to the standard cost ($102,000) reveals an unfavorable variable overhead efficiency variance of $23,000. However, this inefficiency was significantly offset by the $20,000 favorable variable overhead spending variance ($105,000 vs. $125,000). To compute the direct labor quantity variance, subtract the standard cost of direct labor ($48,000) from the actual hours of direct labor at standard rate ($43,200).